scenery curved bridge
Scenery curved bridge
To build a curved bridge at the straits of Johore and Singapore is a plot, a terrible plot under the pretty name of scenery curved bridge.
An Idiot also knows that it should be built a tunnel or straight bridge. Strait of France and England, in spite of strong waves and depth, a tunnel had been successfully built. Tunnel is the best way to solve the traveling. It would not harm the environment. Then, why not the short length of the strait of Johore and Singapore could not build a tunnel to replace the present embankment?
The former PM insisted to build the curved bridge not because aiming to cut course and not for the sake of people. Properly 100% of the Singaporean will cast the votes to express their willing against to build the curved bridge and 99.9% people of the world will think that it is silly to build a curved bridge. Only the troublemakers will support the plot.
A question the people could not get the answer. Why did under the management of 22 years of the former PM has not built the curved bridge, and now the former PM insists the new PM should build the curved bridge?
Another question is that the 2nd bridge of Penang is it going to be built as a curved bridge and all bridges are they in future also going to be built as curved bridges?
The people of the world will ask whether the curved bridge provided facility to let the train running on it and provided the strength to let two big pipes carrying tons and tons of water hanging on its sides.
The people of the world also will ask is there any profit of building a curved bridge. The answer is that it is a waste and silly tasks. The good people and wise man will not do the silly thing.
To build a curved bridge is a plot. What kind of plot is it? The plot is to terminate the supplying of water to Singapore. So straight away to let the people know, why keep the plot under the building of the curved bridge? and keep arguing of building the curved bridge? Wasting time? Really stupid!
To build a curved bridge at the straits of Johore and Singapore is a plot, a terrible plot under the pretty name of scenery curved bridge.
An Idiot also knows that it should be built a tunnel or straight bridge. Strait of France and England, in spite of strong waves and depth, a tunnel had been successfully built. Tunnel is the best way to solve the traveling. It would not harm the environment. Then, why not the short length of the strait of Johore and Singapore could not build a tunnel to replace the present embankment?
The former PM insisted to build the curved bridge not because aiming to cut course and not for the sake of people. Properly 100% of the Singaporean will cast the votes to express their willing against to build the curved bridge and 99.9% people of the world will think that it is silly to build a curved bridge. Only the troublemakers will support the plot.
A question the people could not get the answer. Why did under the management of 22 years of the former PM has not built the curved bridge, and now the former PM insists the new PM should build the curved bridge?
Another question is that the 2nd bridge of Penang is it going to be built as a curved bridge and all bridges are they in future also going to be built as curved bridges?
The people of the world will ask whether the curved bridge provided facility to let the train running on it and provided the strength to let two big pipes carrying tons and tons of water hanging on its sides.
The people of the world also will ask is there any profit of building a curved bridge. The answer is that it is a waste and silly tasks. The good people and wise man will not do the silly thing.
To build a curved bridge is a plot. What kind of plot is it? The plot is to terminate the supplying of water to Singapore. So straight away to let the people know, why keep the plot under the building of the curved bridge? and keep arguing of building the curved bridge? Wasting time? Really stupid!
posted by 谢伯校 at 12:57 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home